Triple
T1228519
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | TJSJ |
E26380
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsInstrumentApproaches |
P24736
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [TJSJ, supportsInstrumentApproaches, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsInstrumentApproaches Context triple: [TJSJ, supportsInstrumentApproaches, yes]
-
A.
hasInstrumentApproach
Indicates that an approach procedure to a location or runway is conducted using specified navigation instruments or instrument-based methods.
-
B.
supportsInstrument
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, resources, or functionality that enables another entity (the instrument) to operate or be used effectively.
-
C.
supportsUse
Indicates that one entity enables, allows, or is compatible with the use or operation of another entity.
-
D.
includesApproach
Indicates that one entity incorporates, utilizes, or is characterized by a particular method, strategy, or approach in relation to another entity or context.
-
E.
hasRunwayApproachType
Indicates the specific type or category of approach procedure associated with a runway.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49484688c8190a1bf285eb396a8b6 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4be3c5d4c819087f9e9e37204c3be |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bb65d61c8190bf0424ea0019a98b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:19 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4bbf83584819088c69366f58586cc |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:47 p.m.