Triple
T12284316
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Champagne Cocktail |
E292788
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalGarnishOil |
P56695
|
FINISHED |
| Object | expressed citrus oils |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: expressed citrus oils | Statement: [Champagne Cocktail, typicalGarnishOil, expressed citrus oils]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalGarnishOil Context triple: [Champagne Cocktail, typicalGarnishOil, expressed citrus oils]
-
A.
isTypicallyGarnishedWith
chosen
Indicates that one item is commonly used as a garnish or decorative finishing element for another.
-
B.
typicalSpices
Indicates that certain spices are commonly or characteristically used in association with a particular dish, cuisine, or ingredient.
-
C.
sauceType
Indicates the specific kind or category of sauce associated with an item or dish.
-
D.
seasoningStyle
Indicates the characteristic way in which an item is flavored or seasoned, such as the method, intensity, or cultural style of its seasoning.
-
E.
ingredientType
Indicates that one entity is classified as a specific type or category of ingredient in relation to another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab690ad081908c0ed3870ec82d53 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9261e1570819084bb4fdb44aa6aea |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d91c4d9a9c8190aeb7beaf9792d8f0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:52 p.m.