Triple
T12282623
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Box Shield |
E292749
|
entity |
| Predicate | vendorProductOf |
P104011
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Box security portfolio |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Box security portfolio | Statement: [Box Shield, vendorProductOf, Box security portfolio]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: vendorProductOf Context triple: [Box Shield, vendorProductOf, Box security portfolio]
-
A.
usesProduct
Indicates that one entity makes use of, applies, or employs a particular product.
-
B.
productFor
Indicates that one entity is intended to be used by, with, or in relation to another entity as its product or offering.
-
C.
byProduct
Indicates that one entity is produced incidentally or as a secondary result of a process, activity, or creation involving another entity.
-
D.
vendorType
Indicates the classification or category of a vendor based on the type of goods or services they provide.
-
E.
vendorDesignation
Indicates that one entity assigns or recognizes a specific vendor status, label, or role for another entity within a business or procurement context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab690ad081908c0ed3870ec82d53 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9261e1570819084bb4fdb44aa6aea |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d91c4d9a9c8190aeb7beaf9792d8f0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d9261b7f088190b69fe6961015fce3 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:32 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:52 p.m.