Triple
T12281414
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | llvm-ar |
E292723
|
entity |
| Predicate | canUpdate |
P62111
|
FINISHED |
| Object | object files in an archive |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: object files in an archive | Statement: [llvm-ar, canUpdate, object files in an archive]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canUpdate Context triple: [llvm-ar, canUpdate, object files in an archive]
-
A.
canSet
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to assign, configure, or change a property, value, or state of another entity.
-
B.
hasUpdateAuthority
chosen
Indicates that one entity holds the permission or control to modify, change, or update another entity.
-
C.
isUpdated
Indicates that an entity has been modified or brought to a more recent state compared to its previous version or a reference point.
-
D.
isUpdateFor
Indicates that one entity serves as a newer or modified version that replaces or revises another entity.
-
E.
requiresUpdate
Indicates that an entity must be refreshed, modified, or brought to a newer state before it can be considered current or valid.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab690ad081908c0ed3870ec82d53 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9261e1570819084bb4fdb44aa6aea |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d91c4d9a9c8190aeb7beaf9792d8f0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:52 p.m.