Triple

T12264040
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject maja (fashionable lower-class Madrilenian woman) E292295 entity
Predicate typicalClothingElement P42160 FINISHED
Object mantilla LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mantilla | Statement: [maja (fashionable lower-class Madrilenian woman), typicalClothingElement, mantilla]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalClothingElement
Context triple: [maja (fashionable lower-class Madrilenian woman), typicalClothingElement, mantilla]
  • A. garmentType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of garment associated with an entity.
  • B. coatCharacteristic
    Indicates that one entity has a particular property, feature, or quality that characterizes its outer covering or surface.
  • C. typicallyWornWith
    Indicates that one item of clothing or accessory is commonly or customarily worn together with another.
  • D. typicallyWornBy
    Indicates that something (such as an item or garment) is most commonly or characteristically worn by a particular type of person or group.
  • E. hasGarment chosen
    Indicates that one entity possesses, wears, or is associated with a particular garment.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab6856488190b5d31178d5015f8e completed April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9380a5e78819086bd4dfe9a83d1f5 completed April 10, 2026, 5:48 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d91c4a66cc819083ce6fcaf5042af6 completed April 10, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:52 p.m.