Triple
T122577
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Android |
E2480
|
entity |
| Predicate | packageManager |
P5091
|
FINISHED |
| Object | APK |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: APK | Statement: [Android, packageManager, APK]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: packageManager Context triple: [Android, packageManager, APK]
-
A.
manager
Indicates that one entity holds a supervisory or administrative role with authority and responsibility over another entity.
-
B.
composer
Indicates that one entity is the creator or writer of a musical work associated with another entity.
-
C.
associatedWithManager
Indicates that an entity has a managerial connection or relationship with a specific manager.
-
D.
managementApproach
Indicates the strategy, methods, or style used to direct, organize, and oversee the activities or resources of an entity or process.
-
E.
notableManager
Indicates that an entity has, or is associated with, a manager who is particularly prominent, distinguished, or widely recognized.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2506c5428819085c28a8884790e29 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:18 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2573b4e7481909ee09d2899f8a74b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2564928208190966a619680a0d6e2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a256c72f6c81909b619b90d829d86e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:45 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m.