Triple

T12247619
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject City of Mobile v. Bolden E291888 entity
Predicate legalStandardAnnounced P18491 FINISHED
Object discriminatory intent requirement for certain voting rights claims LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: discriminatory intent requirement for certain voting rights claims | Statement: [City of Mobile v. Bolden, legalStandardAnnounced, discriminatory intent requirement for certain voting rights claims]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStandardAnnounced
Context triple: [City of Mobile v. Bolden, legalStandardAnnounced, discriminatory intent requirement for certain voting rights claims]
  • A. legalStandardCreated chosen
    Indicates that one entity (such as a case, statute, or regulation) establishes or formulates a legal standard that is then applied or referenced by another entity.
  • B. legalStandardType
    Indicates the specific type or category of legal standard that governs or applies to a given legal rule, decision, or evaluation.
  • C. legalStandardOftenIncludes
    Indicates that a particular legal standard commonly or typically encompasses or contains another specified element, criterion, or requirement.
  • D. legalStandardHistoricallyAssociatedWith
    Indicates that a particular legal standard has been historically linked or traditionally associated with another legal concept, practice, or context.
  • E. regulatoryStandard
    Indicates that one entity serves as an official rule, guideline, or benchmark that governs, constrains, or evaluates the behavior, quality, or performance of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab67950c8190be08450a06228c4b completed April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d91d38ee10819093ed41d2954bf4ef completed April 10, 2026, 3:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d91c46dcd88190a263db30804bff36 completed April 10, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:51 p.m.