Triple
T12240802
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Battle of Włocławek |
E291723
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLanguageOfSide |
P103974
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Polish |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Polish | Statement: [Battle of Włocławek, hasLanguageOfSide, Polish]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLanguageOfSide Context triple: [Battle of Włocławek, hasLanguageOfSide, Polish]
-
A.
hasLanguageOnSides
Indicates that an object or medium features written or spoken language present on multiple sides or surfaces.
-
B.
hasLanguageOn
Indicates that an entity uses or is associated with a particular language in a specific context, medium, or location.
-
C.
hasLanguages
Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more languages it uses, supports, or is expressed in.
-
D.
isLanguageOf
Indicates that a particular language is used as the official or primary language associated with a given entity (such as a person, document, or region).
-
E.
hasLanguageOfSurroundingCountries
Indicates that an entity uses or includes the languages commonly spoken in the countries that geographically surround it.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab67950c8190be08450a06228c4b |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d924a3973c8190a882046963b320fb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d91c41bcbc81909782f4e3c571b218 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d92468052c819090546f36d009a64f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:25 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:51 p.m.