Triple
T12213424
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hidatsa language |
E291021
|
entity |
| Predicate | lexicalSimilarityWith |
P11829
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Crow language |
E279197
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Crow language | Statement: [Hidatsa language, lexicalSimilarityWith, Crow language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Crow language Context triple: [Hidatsa language, lexicalSimilarityWith, Crow language]
-
A.
Crow language
chosen
Crow language is a Native American Siouan language traditionally spoken by the Crow people of the north-central United States, particularly in Montana.
-
B.
Fox language
Fox language is a Native American Algonquian language traditionally spoken by the Meskwaki (Fox), Sauk, and Kickapoo peoples of the central United States.
-
C.
Fur language
The Fur language is an Eastern Sudanic language spoken primarily by the Fur people of western Sudan, especially in the Darfur region.
-
D.
Nancowry language
Nancowry language is an Austroasiatic language spoken by the Nicobarese people on Nancowry and nearby islands in India’s Nicobar archipelago.
-
E.
Bru language
Bru language is a Mon–Khmer language spoken by the Bru people across parts of Laos, Vietnam, and Thailand.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab65923081909acfc61b7a612233 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d91c931cec819083ca19be06a33e1c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f61e5882408190b4853f3a11c249c2 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:55 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:51 p.m.