Triple

T12213017
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gaven Reefs E291010 entity
Predicate conflictRisk P103824 FINISHED
Object potential flashpoint between claimant states LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: potential flashpoint between claimant states | Statement: [Gaven Reefs, conflictRisk, potential flashpoint between claimant states]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conflictRisk
Context triple: [Gaven Reefs, conflictRisk, potential flashpoint between claimant states]
  • A. conflictIn
    Indicates that one entity is involved in, associated with, or occurs within a particular conflict or dispute.
  • B. conflictType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of conflict that characterizes the relationship or interaction between entities.
  • C. conflictCountry
    Indicates that there is an armed conflict or war involving the referenced country as a participant.
  • D. conflictSpecific
    Indicates a specific, concrete instance or type of conflict that exists between the related entities.
  • E. conflictRegion
    Indicates that the entities are located in or associated with a geographic area characterized by active or recent conflict, tension, or hostilities.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab65923081909acfc61b7a612233 completed April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d920e312708190b4aede2e21f5f697 completed April 10, 2026, 4:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d91c3d669c81908eea7ad61122d275 completed April 10, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d920c3dc9881908c396a4ab34f4836 completed April 10, 2026, 4:09 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:51 p.m.