Triple

T12207460
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Wasserstein GAN E290870 entity
Predicate criticUpdateCount P103788 FINISHED
Object multiple critic steps per generator step LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: multiple critic steps per generator step | Statement: [Wasserstein GAN, criticUpdateCount, multiple critic steps per generator step]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: criticUpdateCount
Context triple: [Wasserstein GAN, criticUpdateCount, multiple critic steps per generator step]
  • A. criticOutputs
    Indicates that a critic produces or provides an evaluative response, judgment, or commentary about a target.
  • B. hasCriticism
    Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval, objection, or negative evaluation directed toward another entity.
  • C. criticObjective
    Indicates that an entity serves as the target or focus of a critic’s evaluation, commentary, or judgment.
  • D. usedToCritique
    Indicates that something is employed as a means to analyze, evaluate, or express disapproval of something else.
  • E. outputOfCritic
    Indicates that something is the result or product generated by a critic (e.g., a critique, evaluation, or feedback output).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab65923081909acfc61b7a612233 completed April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d920e312708190b4aede2e21f5f697 completed April 10, 2026, 4:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d91c3d669c81908eea7ad61122d275 completed April 10, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d920c3dc9881908c396a4ab34f4836 completed April 10, 2026, 4:09 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:51 p.m.