Triple
T12207449
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wasserstein GAN |
E290870
|
entity |
| Predicate | criticRole |
P103787
|
FINISHED |
| Object | estimates Wasserstein distance |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: estimates Wasserstein distance | Statement: [Wasserstein GAN, criticRole, estimates Wasserstein distance]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: criticRole Context triple: [Wasserstein GAN, criticRole, estimates Wasserstein distance]
-
A.
criticObjective
Indicates that an entity serves as the target or focus of a critic’s evaluation, commentary, or judgment.
-
B.
criticOutputs
Indicates that a critic produces or provides an evaluative response, judgment, or commentary about a target.
-
C.
aimsToCritique
Indicates an intention to analyze and point out faults, limitations, or weaknesses in something.
-
D.
usedToCritique
Indicates that something is employed as a means to analyze, evaluate, or express disapproval of something else.
-
E.
authorOfCriticalReception
Indicates that an entity is the author or creator of a critical review, evaluation, or reception of another work or subject.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab65923081909acfc61b7a612233 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d920e312708190b4aede2e21f5f697 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d91c3d669c81908eea7ad61122d275 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d920c3dc9881908c396a4ab34f4836 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:09 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:51 p.m.