Triple
T12198925
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Coup of 1772 in Sweden |
E290661
|
entity |
| Predicate | constitutionalConsequence |
P33806
|
FINISHED |
| Object | adoption of the Swedish Constitution of 1772 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: adoption of the Swedish Constitution of 1772 | Statement: [Coup of 1772 in Sweden, constitutionalConsequence, adoption of the Swedish Constitution of 1772]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: constitutionalConsequence Context triple: [Coup of 1772 in Sweden, constitutionalConsequence, adoption of the Swedish Constitution of 1772]
-
A.
constitutionalImpact
Indicates the effect or influence that an action, event, or condition has on a constitution or constitutional framework.
-
B.
constitutionalImplication
Indicates that one constitutional provision, principle, or rule logically entails, influences, or gives rise to another within a legal or governmental framework.
-
C.
constitutionalEffect
chosen
Indicates the impact or consequence that something has on a constitution or constitutional order.
-
D.
constitutionalContribution
Indicates a relationship where an entity plays a role in forming, shaping, or influencing the content, structure, or interpretation of a constitution.
-
E.
constitutionalMention
Indicates that something is explicitly referenced or discussed within a constitution or constitutional document.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab64de5881908d56eb7a75c6cc69 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d938cd2edc8190b1971349dbc0dee0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d91c38321c819080d500d0d64a04f6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:50 p.m.