Triple

T12195144
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Charles Bradlaugh E290566 entity
Predicate legalCase P3996 FINISHED
Object Bradlaugh v. Gossett
Bradlaugh v. Gossett is an 1884 English constitutional law case that established the principle that courts cannot interfere with the internal proceedings of Parliament.
E972230 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bradlaugh v. Gossett | Statement: [Charles Bradlaugh, legalCase, Bradlaugh v. Gossett]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bradlaugh v. Gossett
Context triple: [Charles Bradlaugh, legalCase, Bradlaugh v. Gossett]
  • A. McPherson v. Blacker
    McPherson v. Blacker is an 1892 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state’s authority to determine how its presidential electors are chosen, affirming broad state control over the Electoral College selection process.
  • B. Luther v. Borden
    Luther v. Borden is an 1849 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the "political question" doctrine by holding that the determination of a state's legitimate government under the Constitution’s Guarantee Clause is a matter for Congress, not the courts.
  • C. Bolling v. Sharpe
    Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
  • D. Briggs v. Elliott
    Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
  • E. Chisholm v. Georgia
    Chisholm v. Georgia was a 1793 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could be sued in federal court by a citizen of another state, a ruling that led directly to the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment limiting such suits.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Bradlaugh v. Gossett
Triple: [Charles Bradlaugh, legalCase, Bradlaugh v. Gossett]
Generated description
Bradlaugh v. Gossett is an 1884 English constitutional law case that established the principle that courts cannot interfere with the internal proceedings of Parliament.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bradlaugh v. Gossett
Target entity description: Bradlaugh v. Gossett is an 1884 English constitutional law case that established the principle that courts cannot interfere with the internal proceedings of Parliament.
  • A. McPherson v. Blacker
    McPherson v. Blacker is an 1892 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state’s authority to determine how its presidential electors are chosen, affirming broad state control over the Electoral College selection process.
  • B. Luther v. Borden
    Luther v. Borden is an 1849 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the "political question" doctrine by holding that the determination of a state's legitimate government under the Constitution’s Guarantee Clause is a matter for Congress, not the courts.
  • C. Bolling v. Sharpe
    Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
  • D. Briggs v. Elliott
    Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
  • E. Chisholm v. Georgia
    Chisholm v. Georgia was a 1793 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could be sued in federal court by a citizen of another state, a ruling that led directly to the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment limiting such suits.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab64de5881908d56eb7a75c6cc69 completed April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d91c55a5a881909c0eea2d83c00f49 completed April 10, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f60a8f31508190972d282b5a8816df completed May 2, 2026, 2:30 p.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69f618cab45481909d717c7f656924f2 completed May 2, 2026, 3:31 p.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69f61974e97081908d904cacd86c03c1 completed May 2, 2026, 3:34 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:50 p.m.