Triple
T12195144
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Charles Bradlaugh |
E290566
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalCase |
P3996
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Bradlaugh v. Gossett
Bradlaugh v. Gossett is an 1884 English constitutional law case that established the principle that courts cannot interfere with the internal proceedings of Parliament.
|
E972230
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bradlaugh v. Gossett | Statement: [Charles Bradlaugh, legalCase, Bradlaugh v. Gossett]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bradlaugh v. Gossett Context triple: [Charles Bradlaugh, legalCase, Bradlaugh v. Gossett]
-
A.
McPherson v. Blacker
McPherson v. Blacker is an 1892 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state’s authority to determine how its presidential electors are chosen, affirming broad state control over the Electoral College selection process.
-
B.
Luther v. Borden
Luther v. Borden is an 1849 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the "political question" doctrine by holding that the determination of a state's legitimate government under the Constitution’s Guarantee Clause is a matter for Congress, not the courts.
-
C.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
D.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
E.
Chisholm v. Georgia
Chisholm v. Georgia was a 1793 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could be sued in federal court by a citizen of another state, a ruling that led directly to the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment limiting such suits.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Bradlaugh v. Gossett Triple: [Charles Bradlaugh, legalCase, Bradlaugh v. Gossett]
Generated description
Bradlaugh v. Gossett is an 1884 English constitutional law case that established the principle that courts cannot interfere with the internal proceedings of Parliament.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bradlaugh v. Gossett Target entity description: Bradlaugh v. Gossett is an 1884 English constitutional law case that established the principle that courts cannot interfere with the internal proceedings of Parliament.
-
A.
McPherson v. Blacker
McPherson v. Blacker is an 1892 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state’s authority to determine how its presidential electors are chosen, affirming broad state control over the Electoral College selection process.
-
B.
Luther v. Borden
Luther v. Borden is an 1849 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the "political question" doctrine by holding that the determination of a state's legitimate government under the Constitution’s Guarantee Clause is a matter for Congress, not the courts.
-
C.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
D.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
E.
Chisholm v. Georgia
Chisholm v. Georgia was a 1793 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could be sued in federal court by a citizen of another state, a ruling that led directly to the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment limiting such suits.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab64de5881908d56eb7a75c6cc69 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d91c55a5a881909c0eea2d83c00f49 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f60a8f31508190972d282b5a8816df |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:30 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69f618cab45481909d717c7f656924f2 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69f61974e97081908d904cacd86c03c1 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:50 p.m.