Triple
T12184567
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2003 Canal Hotel bombing |
E290298
|
entity |
| Predicate | securityOutcome |
P103633
|
FINISHED |
| Object | led to increased security measures for UN missions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: led to increased security measures for UN missions | Statement: [2003 Canal Hotel bombing, securityOutcome, led to increased security measures for UN missions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityOutcome Context triple: [2003 Canal Hotel bombing, securityOutcome, led to increased security measures for UN missions]
-
A.
securityOutcomeClaim
Indicates that an entity asserts or reports a particular result, effect, or consequence related to security.
-
B.
securityStatus
Indicates the current level or condition of protection, risk, or vulnerability associated with an entity or system.
-
C.
securityOperation
Indicates an action or process carried out to protect, monitor, or defend assets, systems, or environments from threats or unauthorized activities.
-
D.
securityGuarantee
Indicates a commitment by one party to protect or defend another party against specified threats or risks.
-
E.
security
Indicates that an entity provides protection, safety measures, or safeguards to another entity or against specific threats or risks.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab64de5881908d56eb7a75c6cc69 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d91a83012c81908d04bbab5fdcd8c2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d91510a258819090ef8fbdc2d8707b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d91a7e0fc081909ec9769231e728a4 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:42 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:50 p.m.