Triple
T12172262
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chilean Pacific islands |
E289997
|
entity |
| Predicate | EEZ |
P19836
|
FINISHED |
| Object | within Chilean exclusive economic zone |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: within Chilean exclusive economic zone | Statement: [Chilean Pacific islands, EEZ, within Chilean exclusive economic zone]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: EEZ Context triple: [Chilean Pacific islands, EEZ, within Chilean exclusive economic zone]
-
A.
EEZArea
chosen
Indicates that an area lies within a country's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), where that state has special rights over marine resources and activities.
-
B.
neighboringEEZ
Indicates that the exclusive economic zones (EEZs) of two maritime areas are adjacent or share a common boundary.
-
C.
maximumBreadthOfExclusiveEconomicZone
Indicates the greatest width or extent of a state's exclusive economic zone from its baseline.
-
D.
endSea
Indicates that something marks the boundary or termination point of a sea or sea area.
-
E.
claimedAsTerritorialSeaBy
Indicates that a body of water is asserted by a state or authority to be part of its territorial sea.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab4d6c00819095a9a7c35de83cfb |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d91621ca6c81908365732f361aef13 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d9150e85348190b9b47cda4a17dcd0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:50 p.m.