Triple
T12162096
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Edmunds County, South Dakota |
E289733
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTown |
P847
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Hosmer, South Dakota
Hosmer, South Dakota is a small rural town located in northern South Dakota within Edmunds County.
|
E988030
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hosmer, South Dakota | Statement: [Edmunds County, South Dakota, hasTown, Hosmer, South Dakota]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hosmer, South Dakota Context triple: [Edmunds County, South Dakota, hasTown, Hosmer, South Dakota]
-
A.
Humboldt, South Dakota
Humboldt, South Dakota is a small rural town in eastern South Dakota located just west of Sioux Falls.
-
B.
Hudson, South Dakota
Hudson, South Dakota is a small rural town located in southeastern South Dakota near the Iowa border.
-
C.
Huron, South Dakota
Huron, South Dakota is a small city in east-central South Dakota known as a regional agricultural and commercial hub on the prairie.
-
D.
Bowdle, South Dakota
Bowdle, South Dakota is a small rural city in north-central South Dakota known for its agricultural community and historic prairie setting.
-
E.
Hartford, South Dakota
Hartford, South Dakota is a small city in eastern South Dakota that serves as a growing residential community near Sioux Falls.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Hosmer, South Dakota Triple: [Edmunds County, South Dakota, hasTown, Hosmer, South Dakota]
Generated description
Hosmer, South Dakota is a small rural town located in northern South Dakota within Edmunds County.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hosmer, South Dakota Target entity description: Hosmer, South Dakota is a small rural town located in northern South Dakota within Edmunds County.
-
A.
Humboldt, South Dakota
Humboldt, South Dakota is a small rural town in eastern South Dakota located just west of Sioux Falls.
-
B.
Hudson, South Dakota
Hudson, South Dakota is a small rural town located in southeastern South Dakota near the Iowa border.
-
C.
Huron, South Dakota
Huron, South Dakota is a small city in east-central South Dakota known as a regional agricultural and commercial hub on the prairie.
-
D.
Bowdle, South Dakota
Bowdle, South Dakota is a small rural city in north-central South Dakota known for its agricultural community and historic prairie setting.
-
E.
Hartford, South Dakota
Hartford, South Dakota is a small city in eastern South Dakota that serves as a growing residential community near Sioux Falls.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab4d6c00819095a9a7c35de83cfb |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d915c395e48190a16e97fd29787a51 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:22 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f64b85782481908cca14d8e8345411 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:07 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69f64c535c9881908e5bf07d13fa73c5 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:11 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69f6508afef08190ac7a19b1ee90141e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:50 p.m.