Triple
T12141889
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jeffrey L. Fisher |
E289203
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableCase |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts |
E821196
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts | Statement: [Jeffrey L. Fisher, notableCase, Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts Context triple: [Jeffrey L. Fisher, notableCase, Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts]
-
A.
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts
chosen
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that forensic laboratory reports are testimonial evidence and that defendants have a Sixth Amendment right to confront the analysts who prepared them.
-
B.
Memoirs v. Massachusetts
Memoirs v. Massachusetts is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the legal test for obscenity under the First Amendment, further protecting controversial literary works from censorship.
-
C.
Prince v. Massachusetts
Prince v. Massachusetts is a 1944 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state authority to regulate child labor and limit children's religiously motivated activities in public for their protection.
-
D.
Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services is a landmark federal court case in which the District of Massachusetts struck down key provisions of the Defense of Marriage Act as unconstitutional for denying federal recognition and benefits to same-sex marriages recognized by the state.
-
E.
McCullen v. Coakley
McCullen v. Coakley is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down Massachusetts’ abortion-clinic buffer zone law as violating the First Amendment’s free speech protections.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab4c6710819097a9d228382dde43 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d915a9838081909622cc14df2a2582 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:22 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f5f692ee048190ab42c92296fd28fb |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:49 p.m.