Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock | Statement: [United States federal Indian law and policy, shapedBy, Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock]

Target entity: Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock
Context triple: [United States federal Indian law and policy, shapedBy, Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock]

• A. Shaw v. Hunt
  Shaw v. Hunt is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that further developed the Court’s racial gerrymandering jurisprudence by applying and extending the principles first articulated in Shaw v. Reno.
• B. Hurd v. Hodge
  Hurd v. Hodge is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially restrictive covenants in property deeds could not be judicially enforced in the District of Columbia because such enforcement would violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
• C. Light v. United States
  Light v. United States is a 1911 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld broad federal authority to regulate and control the use of public lands, including grazing, under the Property Clause of the Constitution.
• D. Wolf v. Colorado
  Wolf v. Colorado was a 1949 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Fourth Amendment’s exclusionary rule did not apply to the states, a position later reversed by Mapp v. Ohio.
• E. Lucas v. Earl
  Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock
Triple: [United States federal Indian law and policy, shapedBy, Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock]

Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock is a 1903 U.S. Supreme Court decision that affirmed broad congressional power over Native American tribes, effectively endorsing unilateral alteration of treaties and becoming a cornerstone of federal Indian law.

Target entity: Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock
Target entity description: Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock is a 1903 U.S. Supreme Court decision that affirmed broad congressional power over Native American tribes, effectively endorsing unilateral alteration of treaties and becoming a cornerstone of federal Indian law.

• A. Shaw v. Hunt
  Shaw v. Hunt is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that further developed the Court’s racial gerrymandering jurisprudence by applying and extending the principles first articulated in Shaw v. Reno.
• B. Hurd v. Hodge
  Hurd v. Hodge is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially restrictive covenants in property deeds could not be judicially enforced in the District of Columbia because such enforcement would violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
• C. Light v. United States
  Light v. United States is a 1911 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld broad federal authority to regulate and control the use of public lands, including grazing, under the Property Clause of the Constitution.
• D. Wolf v. Colorado
  Wolf v. Colorado was a 1949 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Fourth Amendment’s exclusionary rule did not apply to the states, a position later reversed by Mapp v. Ohio.
• E. Lucas v. Earl
  Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
• F. None of above. chosen