Triple

T12111326
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gokana E288436 entity
Predicate usesLocalGovernance P57402 FINISHED
Object traditional chieftaincy system LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: traditional chieftaincy system | Statement: [Gokana, usesLocalGovernance, traditional chieftaincy system]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesLocalGovernance
Context triple: [Gokana, usesLocalGovernance, traditional chieftaincy system]
  • A. hasLocalGovernanceType chosen
    Indicates the specific form or system of local governance that applies to an entity.
  • B. hasLocalGovernanceRole
    Indicates that an entity holds an official position or responsibility within a local or municipal governing body.
  • C. hasLocalSelfGovernment
    Indicates that an entity possesses its own local governing authority with decision-making powers over local affairs.
  • D. selfGovernedBy
    Indicates that an entity independently controls and manages itself without external governance.
  • E. governedForLocalServicesBy
    Indicates that an entity’s local services are administered, managed, or overseen by a specified governing authority or body.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab4a5c448190a110d1273314b21a completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9164ada5081908676bd9e5947268a completed April 10, 2026, 3:24 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d9150497408190921334d21503375a completed April 10, 2026, 3:19 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:49 p.m.