Triple
T1210658
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Supreme Court of South Korea |
E25990
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasJudicialReviewOver |
P1004
|
FINISHED |
| Object | decisions of lower courts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: decisions of lower courts | Statement: [Supreme Court of South Korea, hasJudicialReviewOver, decisions of lower courts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasJudicialReviewOver Context triple: [Supreme Court of South Korea, hasJudicialReviewOver, decisions of lower courts]
-
A.
judicialReviewBy
chosen
Indicates that a judicial body examines and evaluates the legality or constitutionality of an action, decision, or rule made by another authority.
-
B.
hasJudiciary
Indicates that an entity possesses, is served by, or is under the authority of a judicial body or legal court system.
-
C.
hasJurisdictionOver
Indicates that one authority or governing body holds legal power or control to make and enforce decisions over another entity, area, or matter.
-
D.
hasJudge
Indicates that a legal case, proceeding, or decision is presided over or decided by a particular judge.
-
E.
hasAppellateJurisdictionIn
Indicates that one legal authority has the power to review and decide appeals arising from cases within a specified court, region, or jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4942b30f08190a91c60573e16b5ef |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4bde4670481908c16a3a8c1a54aad |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bb6078088190ba0221ae3368416c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:19 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:46 p.m.