Triple

T12103883
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Contendings of Horus and Set E288253 entity
Predicate portraysDeity P103298 FINISHED
Object Horus as legitimate heir of Osiris LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Horus as legitimate heir of Osiris | Statement: [Contendings of Horus and Set, portraysDeity, Horus as legitimate heir of Osiris]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: portraysDeity
Context triple: [Contendings of Horus and Set, portraysDeity, Horus as legitimate heir of Osiris]
  • A. depictedDeity
    Indicates that one entity is a deity who is shown or represented in an image, artwork, or visual depiction associated with another entity.
  • B. depictedWithDeity
    Indicates that an entity is shown or represented together with a particular deity in some form of depiction.
  • C. representsDeity
    Indicates that one entity serves as a symbolic, artistic, or conceptual depiction of a deity associated with another entity.
  • D. deityCategory
    Indicates that one entity is classified as belonging to a particular category or type of deity in relation to another entity.
  • E. hasDeity
    Indicates that one entity recognizes, worships, or is associated with another entity as its deity or divine figure.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab4a5c448190a110d1273314b21a completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9164ada5081908676bd9e5947268a completed April 10, 2026, 3:24 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d9150497408190921334d21503375a completed April 10, 2026, 3:19 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d916481a008190ae66677b9e6dd961 completed April 10, 2026, 3:24 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:48 p.m.