Triple

T12090987
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 1932 New York gubernatorial election E287938 entity
Predicate Herbert H. Lehman-voteShare P103447 FINISHED
Object approximately 57.5% LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: approximately 57.5% | Statement: [1932 New York gubernatorial election, Herbert H. Lehman-voteShare, approximately 57.5%]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: Herbert H. Lehman-voteShare
Context triple: [1932 New York gubernatorial election, Herbert H. Lehman-voteShare, approximately 57.5%]
  • A. popularVoteForThomasEDewey
    Indicates that the popular vote in an election was cast in favor of Thomas E. Dewey.
  • B. popularVotesForCharlesEvansHughes
    Indicates the number of popular votes that were cast in favor of Charles Evans Hughes in an election.
  • C. RobertMLaFollettePopularVoteShare
    Indicates the proportion of the total popular vote that was received by Robert M. La Follette in a given election or electoral context.
  • D. hadRightToElect
    Indicates that an entity possessed the legal or formal authority to choose or vote for another entity in an election or selection process.
  • E. voteFor
    Indicates that one entity casts or expresses a vote in favor of another entity or option.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab4964708190850585628b287b0c completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9178ad99c8190a54777b9bbe998bc completed April 10, 2026, 3:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d915000454819089fee00022055599 completed April 10, 2026, 3:19 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d9178814e081908f67e3846718530e completed April 10, 2026, 3:30 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:48 p.m.