Triple
T12085812
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act |
E287803
|
entity |
| Predicate | constitutionalBasis |
P125
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Enforcement Clause of the Fifteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution |
E403300
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Enforcement Clause of the Fifteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution | Statement: [Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, constitutionalBasis, Enforcement Clause of the Fifteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Enforcement Clause of the Fifteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution Context triple: [Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, constitutionalBasis, Enforcement Clause of the Fifteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution]
-
A.
Fifteenth Amendment Enforcement Clause
chosen
The Fifteenth Amendment Enforcement Clause is the constitutional provision granting Congress the power to pass legislation protecting citizens’ voting rights from racial discrimination.
-
B.
United States Supreme Court as an enforcement of the Thirteenth Amendment
The United States Supreme Court, in this capacity, is the constitutional authority that has affirmed and interpreted federal legislation like the Peonage Act of 1867 as valid means of enforcing the Thirteenth Amendment’s prohibition of slavery and involuntary servitude.
-
C.
Shelby County v. Holder
Shelby County v. Holder is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly weakened the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by striking down the formula used to determine which jurisdictions required federal preclearance for changes to their voting laws.
-
D.
Section 10 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
Section 10 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a provision that was challenged but ultimately upheld by the Supreme Court in South Carolina v. Katzenbach as a valid exercise of Congress’s power to enforce voting rights protections.
-
E.
Section 6 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
Section 6 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a key enforcement provision that authorizes the appointment of federal examiners to oversee voter registration and protect voting rights in jurisdictions with histories of discrimination.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab4964708190850585628b287b0c |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d91514c78c8190bc1cd569e524e8b4 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f5f668eff88190877ce9bb991c1258 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:48 p.m.