Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Johnson v. Zerbst | Statement: [Johnson v. Zerbst, fullCaseName, Johnson v. Zerbst]

Target entity: Johnson v. Zerbst
Context triple: [Johnson v. Zerbst, fullCaseName, Johnson v. Zerbst]

• A. Johnson v. Zerbst chosen
  Johnson v. Zerbst is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held federal courts must provide counsel to indigent defendants in serious criminal cases unless there is a competent and intelligent waiver.
• B. Reynolds v. United States
  Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
• C. Johnson v. Eisentrager
  Johnson v. Eisentrager is a 1950 U.S. Supreme Court case that held nonresident enemy aliens detained outside U.S. sovereign territory had no constitutional right to seek habeas corpus in American courts.
• D. Mapp v. Ohio
  Mapp v. Ohio is a landmark 1961 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied the exclusionary rule to the states, holding that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in state criminal prosecutions.
• E. Gitlow v. New York
  Gitlow v. New York is a 1925 U.S. Supreme Court case that marked a major step in applying First Amendment free speech protections to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.