Triple
T12068882
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Analytical Reasoning |
E287368
|
entity |
| Predicate | commonPreparationMethod |
P103029
|
FINISHED |
| Object | practice with logic games |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: practice with logic games | Statement: [Analytical Reasoning, commonPreparationMethod, practice with logic games]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commonPreparationMethod Context triple: [Analytical Reasoning, commonPreparationMethod, practice with logic games]
-
A.
recommendedPreparation
Indicates that one entity is suggested or advised as a suitable preparation or prerequisite for engaging with another entity.
-
B.
traditionalPreparation
Indicates that something is prepared or made using customary, long-established methods or techniques associated with a particular culture or practice.
-
C.
typicalPreparation
Indicates the usual or standard way in which something is prepared or made.
-
D.
meatPreparation
Indicates the method or process by which meat is treated, cooked, or otherwise prepared for consumption.
-
E.
usesCookingMethod
Indicates that one entity prepares or processes another entity by applying a specific cooking technique or method.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab4846e081908ee7bbd66a6d3459 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9100b4ca8819084845ca4c13e34ce |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d902bda47c8190b94860b31df4a98c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d91006e14081909838412df082f794 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:48 p.m.