Triple
T12064048
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | California State Route 84 |
E287247
|
entity |
| Predicate | partlyFreeway |
P80869
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [California State Route 84, partlyFreeway, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partlyFreeway Context triple: [California State Route 84, partlyFreeway, yes]
-
A.
isFreeway
Indicates that a given road segment functions as a freeway, typically designed for high-speed, limited-access vehicular traffic.
-
B.
hasFreewaySegments
chosen
Indicates that one entity includes, contains, or is associated with specific freeway segments as part of its structure or network.
-
C.
servedByFreeway
Indicates that a location or area is directly accessed or connected by a freeway.
-
D.
roadNetworkPartOf
Indicates that one road network segment or component is a constituent part of a larger road network.
-
E.
completedAsFreeway
Indicates that a roadway segment has been fully constructed or upgraded to meet freeway standards, typically implying controlled access and grade-separated intersections.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab4846e081908ee7bbd66a6d3459 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9100b4ca8819084845ca4c13e34ce |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d902bda47c8190b94860b31df4a98c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:48 p.m.