Triple
T12062742
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mazury |
E287213
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMajorTown |
P316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ruciane-Nida |
E220543
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ruciane-Nida | Statement: [Mazury, hasMajorTown, Ruciane-Nida]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ruciane-Nida Context triple: [Mazury, hasMajorTown, Ruciane-Nida]
-
A.
Ruciane-Nida
chosen
Ruciane-Nida is a small town and popular lakeside tourist resort in northeastern Poland, known for its location amid the forests and lakes of the Masurian Lake District.
-
B.
Cahul
Cahul is a city in southern Moldova known as a regional economic center and spa destination famed for its mineral waters.
-
C.
Slobozia
Slobozia is a city in southeastern Romania that serves as the capital of Ialomița County and an important local administrative and economic center.
-
D.
Medgidia
Medgidia is a city in southeastern Romania, situated in the historical region of Dobruja and known as an important local industrial and transportation hub.
-
E.
Pitești
Pitești is a city in southern Romania, known as an important industrial and transportation hub and the capital of Argeș County.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab4846e081908ee7bbd66a6d3459 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9043f82248190b05692aa0dc178a8 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f5f654eb1881908d656009f1362ecf |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:48 p.m.