Triple

T12060150
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject A Tale of Two Kitties E287144 entity
Predicate tweetyDesign P1529 FINISHED
Object early feral version of Tweety LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: early feral version of Tweety | Statement: [A Tale of Two Kitties, tweetyDesign, early feral version of Tweety]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: tweetyDesign
Context triple: [A Tale of Two Kitties, tweetyDesign, early feral version of Tweety]
  • A. designTrend
    Indicates a prevailing or emerging stylistic direction or pattern that influences how something is designed over a period of time.
  • B. designsFor
    Indicates that one entity creates or plans something specifically intended to serve, suit, or be used by another entity.
  • C. designsBy
    Indicates that one entity is the creator or designer responsible for the conception or design of another entity.
  • D. tonalDesign
    Indicates the relationship in which one entity defines, specifies, or embodies the tonal structure or tonal scheme used by another entity (such as a work, passage, or system).
  • E. hasDesign chosen
    Indicates that one entity possesses, embodies, or is characterized by a particular design associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab4780948190bdb9f7620c2ac27e completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9100b4ca8819084845ca4c13e34ce completed April 10, 2026, 2:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d902bda47c8190b94860b31df4a98c completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:47 p.m.