Triple
T12044979
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | How to Do Things with Words |
E286761
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | work of philosophy of language |
C11819
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: work of philosophy of language Context triple: [How to Do Things with Words, instanceOf, work of philosophy of language]
-
A.
linguistic philosopher
A linguistic philosopher is a thinker who analyzes how language shapes meaning, thought, and reality, often examining the structure, use, and limits of linguistic expressions to clarify philosophical problems.
-
B.
work in analytic philosophy
chosen
Work in analytic philosophy is the systematic, often language-focused investigation of philosophical problems using precise argumentation, logical analysis, and conceptual clarification.
-
C.
theory of sense and reference
The theory of sense and reference is a philosophical framework, originating with Frege, that distinguishes between the meaning or mode of presentation of an expression (sense) and the actual object or truth-value it stands for (reference) to explain how language conveys information and supports rational thought.
-
D.
work of logic
A work of logic is a systematic, often formal, investigation that analyzes the principles of valid reasoning, inference, and argument structure.
-
E.
linguistic work
A linguistic work is a created artifact—such as a text, speech, or signed performance—whose primary purpose is to convey meaning through a structured natural or formal language.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab4780948190bdb9f7620c2ac27e |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:47 p.m.