Triple
T12044626
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | On Brute Facts |
E286752
|
entity |
| Predicate | philosophicalArea |
P95946
|
FINISHED |
| Object | action theory |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: action theory | Statement: [On Brute Facts, philosophicalArea, action theory]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: philosophicalArea Context triple: [On Brute Facts, philosophicalArea, action theory]
-
A.
philosophyScope
chosen
Indicates the conceptual domain or range of topics, questions, or issues that a particular philosophical view, theory, or inquiry is concerned with.
-
B.
philosophicalTheme
Indicates that a work, idea, or discourse centrally involves or explores a particular philosophical concept, question, or line of thought.
-
C.
governedByPhilosophy
Indicates that an entity’s actions, policies, or structure are directed or constrained by a particular philosophical doctrine or set of principles.
-
D.
philosophicalConcept
Indicates that one entity is a philosophical concept that characterizes, explains, or is thematically central to the other entity.
-
E.
philosophicalStatus
Indicates the philosophical position, stance, or classification attributed to an entity within a given conceptual or theoretical framework.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab4780948190bdb9f7620c2ac27e |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9100b4ca8819084845ca4c13e34ce |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d902bac9e08190aa1a99c835f29542 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:47 p.m.