Triple

T12039807
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Yoruboid languages E286629 entity
Predicate useImplosives P102893 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Yoruboid languages, useImplosives, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: useImplosives
Context triple: [Yoruboid languages, useImplosives, true]
  • A. hasEjectiveConsonants
    Indicates that a language’s consonant inventory includes ejective consonants, produced with a glottalic egressive airstream mechanism.
  • B. usesFinalConsonants
    Indicates that an entity employs or contains consonant sounds in final position, such as at the end of a word, syllable, or phonological unit.
  • C. isGuttural
    Indicates that a sound, phoneme, or articulation is produced in the throat or back of the vocal tract (i.e., is guttural).
  • D. supportsConjunctConsonants
    Indicates that a writing system or orthographic convention allows the formation and use of conjunct consonant clusters (combined consonant characters).
  • E. hasFricatives
    Indicates that the related linguistic element includes or is characterized by fricative sounds in its phonological inventory or articulation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab4669e48190b59246358b0383ab completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9100b4ca8819084845ca4c13e34ce completed April 10, 2026, 2:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d902bac9e08190aa1a99c835f29542 completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d91006e14081909838412df082f794 completed April 10, 2026, 2:58 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:47 p.m.