Triple
T12033856
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ulrich Greifelt |
E286482
|
entity |
| Predicate | subjectOf |
P38
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RuSHA Trial judgment |
E41933
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RuSHA Trial judgment | Statement: [Ulrich Greifelt, subjectOf, RuSHA Trial judgment]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RuSHA Trial judgment Context triple: [Ulrich Greifelt, subjectOf, RuSHA Trial judgment]
-
A.
RuSHA Trial
chosen
The RuSHA Trial was one of the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials in which SS officials were prosecuted for implementing Nazi racial policies, including forced resettlement, kidnapping of children, and persecution based on racial criteria.
-
B.
The RuSHA Case
The RuSHA Case was one of the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials in which SS officials were prosecuted for racial policies, including forced resettlement, kidnapping of children, and persecution tied to Nazi racial ideology.
-
C.
Homma trial
The Homma trial was a post–World War II U.S. military tribunal that prosecuted Japanese General Masaharu Homma for war crimes committed by his forces against American and Filipino prisoners in the Philippines.
-
D.
The Rash Act
The Rash Act is a lesser-known modernist novel by Ford Madox Ford that explores themes of identity, fate, and the psychological consequences of impulsive decisions.
-
E.
Shelton v. Tucker
Shelton v. Tucker was a 1960 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down an Arkansas law requiring teachers to disclose all organizational affiliations, reinforcing First Amendment protections for freedom of association.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab4669e48190b59246358b0383ab |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9040724ec8190808f334013ddc6d6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f5f646423c819088575a7032e6a9a3 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:47 p.m.