Triple

T12029142
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Information Quality Act E286355 entity
Predicate judicialReviewStatus P102854 FINISHED
Object limited availability of judicial review LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: limited availability of judicial review | Statement: [Information Quality Act, judicialReviewStatus, limited availability of judicial review]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: judicialReviewStatus
Context triple: [Information Quality Act, judicialReviewStatus, limited availability of judicial review]
  • A. judicialStatus
    Indicates the legal or court-related condition or standing of an entity within a judicial process (e.g., pending, decided, appealed).
  • B. courtStatus
    Indicates the current legal or procedural state of a case or matter within a court system.
  • C. judicialReviewBy
    Indicates that a judicial body examines and evaluates the legality or constitutionality of an action, decision, or rule made by another authority.
  • D. courtReview
    Indicates that a court formally examines a decision, action, or case to determine its legality, correctness, or appropriateness.
  • E. appealStatus
    Indicates the current state or outcome of an appeal within a review or decision process.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab4669e48190b59246358b0383ab completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9100b4ca8819084845ca4c13e34ce completed April 10, 2026, 2:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d902b6ebbc8190b13c44a61c6f81b9 completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d91006e14081909838412df082f794 completed April 10, 2026, 2:58 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:47 p.m.