Triple
T12026996
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Connes embedding problem |
E286302
|
entity |
| Predicate | disproofMethod |
P64864
|
FINISHED |
| Object | construction of non-hyperlinear II₁ factors |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: construction of non-hyperlinear II₁ factors | Statement: [Connes embedding problem, disproofMethod, construction of non-hyperlinear II₁ factors]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: disproofMethod Context triple: [Connes embedding problem, disproofMethod, construction of non-hyperlinear II₁ factors]
-
A.
hasCounterexample
chosen
Indicates that there exists at least one specific case or instance that disproves or violates a given claim, rule, or general statement.
-
B.
contradictedTheory
Indicates that one entity has presented evidence, arguments, or findings that oppose, challenge, or invalidate the theory proposed by another entity.
-
C.
proved
Indicates that one entity has demonstrated the truth or validity of another entity (such as a statement, theorem, or claim) through logical or evidential means.
-
D.
hasAlternativeProofMethod
Indicates that there exists a different proof technique or approach that can be used to establish the same result or theorem.
-
E.
repudiationMethod
Indicates the specific means or process by which a party denies, rejects, or invalidates a claim, action, or association.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab4669e48190b59246358b0383ab |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9100b4ca8819084845ca4c13e34ce |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d902b6ebbc8190b13c44a61c6f81b9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:47 p.m.