Triple

T12011552
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co. E285915 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Company E285915 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Company | Statement: [Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co., fullCaseName, Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Company]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Company
Context triple: [Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co., fullCaseName, Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Company]
  • A. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co. chosen
    Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co. is a 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the modern test for evaluating state laws under the Constitution’s Contract Clause, particularly in the context of regulated utility contracts.
  • B. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.
    United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co. is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly broadened the federal government’s authority to regulate non-navigable waterways under the Commerce Clause.
  • C. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission
    Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission is a landmark 1980 U.S. Supreme Court case that established a four-part test for determining the constitutionality of government restrictions on commercial speech under the First Amendment.
  • D. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC
    Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited courts’ ability to impose additional procedural requirements on federal agencies beyond those mandated by the Administrative Procedure Act and relevant statutes.
  • E. Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.
    Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. was a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court decision that briefly allowed Congress to subject states to private suits for damages under its Article I powers before being later overruled.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab45a368819084fce08bf0dc3705 completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d903d7777481908cd5a001f75e2ee3 completed April 10, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f48b363c6481908c8414c1eecc14f5 completed May 1, 2026, 11:15 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:46 p.m.