Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Carmell v. Texas | Statement: [Ex Post Facto Clause, interpretedIn, Carmell v. Texas]

Target entity: Carmell v. Texas
Context triple: [Ex Post Facto Clause, interpretedIn, Carmell v. Texas]

• A. Sossamon v. Texas
  Sossamon v. Texas is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held states do not consent to suits for money damages under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act by accepting federal funds, reinforcing principles of state sovereign immunity.
• B. Moore v. Texas
  Moore v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the standards for determining intellectual disability in capital cases, reinforcing constitutional limits on executing individuals with such disabilities.
• C. Jurek v. Texas
  Jurek v. Texas is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of Texas’s capital sentencing scheme and helped define the modern framework for death penalty procedures under the Eighth Amendment.
• D. Branch v. Texas
  Branch v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality and application of the death penalty in the wake of the landmark Furman v. Georgia decision.
• E. Van Orden v. Perry
  Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Carmell v. Texas
Triple: [Ex Post Facto Clause, interpretedIn, Carmell v. Texas]

Carmell v. Texas is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause by holding that a law easing the evidentiary requirements for conviction in certain sexual offense cases could not be applied retroactively.

Target entity: Carmell v. Texas
Target entity description: Carmell v. Texas is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause by holding that a law easing the evidentiary requirements for conviction in certain sexual offense cases could not be applied retroactively.

• A. Sossamon v. Texas
  Sossamon v. Texas is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held states do not consent to suits for money damages under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act by accepting federal funds, reinforcing principles of state sovereign immunity.
• B. Moore v. Texas
  Moore v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the standards for determining intellectual disability in capital cases, reinforcing constitutional limits on executing individuals with such disabilities.
• C. Jurek v. Texas
  Jurek v. Texas is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of Texas’s capital sentencing scheme and helped define the modern framework for death penalty procedures under the Eighth Amendment.
• D. Branch v. Texas
  Branch v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality and application of the death penalty in the wake of the landmark Furman v. Georgia decision.
• E. Van Orden v. Perry
  Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
• F. None of above. chosen