Triple

T12011102
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States v. Munoz-Flores E285905 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object United States v. Humberto Munoz-Flores E285905 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Humberto Munoz-Flores | Statement: [United States v. Munoz-Flores, fullCaseName, United States v. Humberto Munoz-Flores]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: United States v. Humberto Munoz-Flores
Context triple: [United States v. Munoz-Flores, fullCaseName, United States v. Humberto Munoz-Flores]
  • A. United States v. Munoz-Flores chosen
    United States v. Munoz-Flores is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether a federal statute imposing monetary assessments on convicted offenders violated the Constitution’s Origination Clause.
  • B. United States v. Ramirez-Lopez
    United States v. Ramirez-Lopez is a federal appellate criminal case known for Judge Alex Kozinski’s opinion addressing evidentiary and procedural issues in illegal reentry prosecutions.
  • C. United States v. Eichman
    United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
  • D. United States v. Patane
    United States v. Patane is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the exclusionary rule by holding that physical evidence obtained as a result of unwarned but voluntary statements is admissible despite a Miranda violation.
  • E. Ocampo v. United States
    Ocampo v. United States is a 1914 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied and developed the Insular Cases framework governing constitutional rights in unincorporated American territories.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab45a368819084fce08bf0dc3705 completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d903d7777481908cd5a001f75e2ee3 completed April 10, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f48b363c6481908c8414c1eecc14f5 completed May 1, 2026, 11:15 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:46 p.m.