Triple

T12010686
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject François Sevez E285895 entity
Predicate serviceNumberOrEquivalent P102647 FINISHED
Object French officer corps LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: French officer corps | Statement: [François Sevez, serviceNumberOrEquivalent, French officer corps]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: serviceNumberOrEquivalent
Context triple: [François Sevez, serviceNumberOrEquivalent, French officer corps]
  • A. serviceNumber
    Indicates a unique identifying number assigned to a service, used to reference, track, or distinguish that service from others.
  • B. serviceNumberLabel
    Indicates that a label or identifier is assigned to denote the service number associated with an entity.
  • C. serviceNumberApproximate
    Indicates that one entity’s service number is approximately equal to, but not necessarily exactly the same as, another entity’s service number.
  • D. serviceNumbering
    Indicates that a specific service is assigned or associated with a particular identifying number or code.
  • E. serviceNumberOrClass
    Indicates that one entity specifies the service identifier or class designation associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab45a368819084fce08bf0dc3705 completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d903d7777481908cd5a001f75e2ee3 completed April 10, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d902b245cc8190af96a9c2bd9c6250 completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d9038e39f881908c58c19802ba2eb0 completed April 10, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:46 p.m.