Triple
T12006547
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Phileas Fogg |
E285790
|
entity |
| Predicate | outcomeOfWager |
P102634
|
FINISHED |
| Object | wins the wager |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: wins the wager | Statement: [Phileas Fogg, outcomeOfWager, wins the wager]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: outcomeOfWager Context triple: [Phileas Fogg, outcomeOfWager, wins the wager]
-
A.
playerOutcome
Indicates the result or consequence experienced by a player in a game, match, or scenario (such as winning, losing, or drawing).
-
B.
outcomeOf
Indicates that one entity is the result, consequence, or product that arises from another entity, event, or process.
-
C.
gameOutcome
Indicates the result or final status of a game, such as which side won, lost, or if it ended in a draw.
-
D.
outcomeOfTrial
Indicates that a particular result or verdict is produced as the consequence of a specific trial or legal proceeding.
-
E.
subsequentOutcomeForWinner
Indicates that the predicate links a winner to an outcome or event that occurs to or for them after their initial victory.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab45a368819084fce08bf0dc3705 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d903c5cfc08190821e4b2940c51416 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d902b245cc8190af96a9c2bd9c6250 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d9038e39f881908c58c19802ba2eb0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:46 p.m.