Triple
T11998564
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Judicial Qualifications Commission (Florida) |
E285592
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | state judicial disciplinary agency |
C28947
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: state judicial disciplinary agency Context triple: [Judicial Qualifications Commission (Florida), instanceOf, state judicial disciplinary agency]
-
A.
judicial discipline system
chosen
A judicial discipline system is a formal framework of rules, procedures, and oversight mechanisms designed to investigate, evaluate, and sanction misconduct or ethical violations by judges to maintain integrity and public confidence in the judiciary.
-
B.
state regulatory agency
A state regulatory agency is a government body at the state level responsible for creating, implementing, and enforcing rules and standards within specific sectors (such as utilities, health, or finance) to protect the public interest and ensure legal compliance.
-
C.
judicial ethics committee
A judicial ethics committee is a body that reviews, advises on, and enforces standards of ethical conduct for judges to maintain integrity, impartiality, and public confidence in the judiciary.
-
D.
state supervision agency
A state supervision agency is a government entity responsible for overseeing, regulating, and ensuring compliance with laws, standards, and policies within specific sectors or activities at the state level.
-
E.
judicial administrative office
A judicial administrative office is an organizational unit within the court system responsible for managing the non-judicial functions of the judiciary, such as case processing, records management, budgeting, staffing, and overall court operations support.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab44a77c8190a652f4b27164e4ef |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:46 p.m.