Triple
T11973627
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Levice |
E284980
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTwinTown |
P919
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Nowy Sącz, Poland |
E23790
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nowy Sącz, Poland | Statement: [Levice, hasTwinTown, Nowy Sącz, Poland]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Nowy Sącz, Poland Context triple: [Levice, hasTwinTown, Nowy Sącz, Poland]
-
A.
Nowy Sącz
chosen
Nowy Sącz is a historic city in southern Poland known for its well-preserved Old Town, cultural heritage, and role as a local economic and administrative center.
-
B.
Kozienice, Poland
Kozienice is a historic town in east-central Poland known for its location along the Vistula River and proximity to the Kozienice Landscape Park.
-
C.
Stary Sącz
Stary Sącz is a historic town in southern Poland known for its well-preserved medieval urban layout and cultural heritage.
-
D.
Sianów
Sianów is a small town in northwestern Poland known for its historical ties to the Pomerania region and its location near the Baltic coast.
-
E.
Chojnice, Poland
Chojnice is a historic town in northern Poland’s Pomeranian Voivodeship, known for its medieval architecture and role as a local cultural and economic center.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab2eaeb881909f7914758f859413 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9039107e48190ae4c4efd6257dd3c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f4598d62a8819087f83912d1e45b27 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 7:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:46 p.m.