Triple

T1197069
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ryukyuan languages E25690 entity
Predicate hasLexicalRelation P11829 FINISHED
Object shares cognates with Japanese LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: shares cognates with Japanese | Statement: [Ryukyuan languages, hasLexicalRelation, shares cognates with Japanese]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLexicalRelation
Context triple: [Ryukyuan languages, hasLexicalRelation, shares cognates with Japanese]
  • A. hasLexicalInfluenceOn
    Indicates that one linguistic element (such as a word, phrase, or lexicon) has affected or shaped the form, usage, or meaning of another linguistic element.
  • B. semanticRelation
    Indicates a general meaning-based connection between two entities, such as similarity, implication, or conceptual association.
  • C. hasLexicalSimilarityWith chosen
    Indicates that two linguistic items share a significant degree of similarity in form, structure, or wording.
  • D. linguisticallyRelatedTo
    Indicates that two entities are connected through a linguistic relationship, such as sharing a common language, origin, structure, or other language-based association.
  • E. hasGrammaticalSimilarityTo
    Indicates that two linguistic elements share similar grammatical structure, form, or function.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a49429f5ec8190a6a205eb0ae81e5e completed March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4bd9a305c819091513394f1b67784 completed March 1, 2026, 10:28 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bb5d40a08190b7682d8ef8075421 completed March 1, 2026, 10:19 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:46 p.m.