Triple

T1197043
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ryukyuan languages E25690 entity
Predicate hasPart P35 FINISHED
Object Miyako language E135027 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Miyako language | Statement: [Ryukyuan languages, hasPart, Miyako language]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Miyako language
Context triple: [Ryukyuan languages, hasPart, Miyako language]
  • A. Kawaiisu language
    Kawaiisu language is an endangered Uto-Aztecan language traditionally spoken by the Kawaiisu people of southern California.
  • B. Chimariko language
    The Chimariko language is an extinct Native American language once spoken in northwestern California, often classified within the proposed Hokan language family.
  • C. Amami language chosen
    The Amami language is a Ryukyuan language spoken in Japan’s Amami Islands, known for its endangered status and distinct phonology and grammar within the Japonic language family.
  • D. Unami language
    The Unami language is an Eastern Algonquian Native American language traditionally spoken by the Lenape (Delaware) people in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States.
  • E. Koya language
    Koya language is a South-Central Dravidian language spoken by the Koya tribal communities in central and southern India.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a49429f5ec8190a6a205eb0ae81e5e completed March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4bd9a305c819091513394f1b67784 completed March 1, 2026, 10:28 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ac8a08e1a881908b3f3a41cc1fb010 completed March 7, 2026, 8:26 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:46 p.m.