Triple

T11969349
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Southern heritage movement E284873 entity
Predicate hasSupporterClaim P4133 FINISHED
Object focus on honoring ancestors LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: focus on honoring ancestors | Statement: [Southern heritage movement, hasSupporterClaim, focus on honoring ancestors]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSupporterClaim
Context triple: [Southern heritage movement, hasSupporterClaim, focus on honoring ancestors]
  • A. hasSupporter
    Indicates that one entity supports, endorses, or backs another entity.
  • B. supportsClaim chosen
    Indicates that one entity provides evidence, reasoning, or backing that strengthens or validates the truth or credibility of another entity’s claim.
  • C. hasClaimOn
    Indicates that one entity holds a right, entitlement, or demand over another entity or its resources.
  • D. supportedClaimant
    Indicates that one entity has provided assistance, backing, or advocacy in favor of another entity who is making a claim or seeking a benefit.
  • E. hasSupporterGroup
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a group of supporters that backs, promotes, or advocates for it.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab2eaeb881909f7914758f859413 completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9037bee54819085242a3ef3e286f9 completed April 10, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d8bb40f30c8190a0e0719bd67542bf completed April 10, 2026, 8:56 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:46 p.m.