Triple

T11958461
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Open Multi-Processing E284609 entity
Predicate hasDirectiveSyntax P95858 FINISHED
Object pragma-based for C and C++ LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: pragma-based for C and C++ | Statement: [Open Multi-Processing, hasDirectiveSyntax, pragma-based for C and C++]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDirectiveSyntax
Context triple: [Open Multi-Processing, hasDirectiveSyntax, pragma-based for C and C++]
  • A. hasDirective
    Indicates that one entity issues, contains, or is governed by a specific directive or instruction associated with another entity.
  • B. hasSyntaxKeyword chosen
    Indicates that an element or construct is associated with, or marked by, a specific keyword in the syntax of a language or formal system.
  • C. usesDirective
    Indicates that one entity applies, references, or relies on a specific directive issued or defined by another entity.
  • D. hasSyntaxInfluenceFrom
    Indicates that the syntax of one entity is influenced, shaped, or derived from the syntax of another entity.
  • E. definesSyntax
    Indicates that one entity specifies or determines the formal structure, rules, or grammar by which another entity is expressed or interpreted.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab2db38c8190b1f0ed6663ef8ada completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d903681a00819098c2b5260e2ef834 completed April 10, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d8bb3e48e08190b2fee43af4f57323 completed April 10, 2026, 8:56 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:45 p.m.