Triple

T11952226
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sierra County E284452 entity
Predicate contains P35 FINISHED
Object Loyalton E956854 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Loyalton | Statement: [Sierra County, contains, Loyalton]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Loyalton
Context triple: [Sierra County, contains, Loyalton]
  • A. Loyalton chosen
    Loyalton is a small city in northeastern California that serves as the primary population center of rural Sierra County.
  • B. Tenneville
    Tenneville is a rural municipality in the Ardennes region of southern Belgium, known for its forests and small villages.
  • C. Craryville
    Craryville is a small hamlet in Columbia County, New York, known as one of the communities within the town of Copake.
  • D. Lockington
    Lockington is a small rural town in northern Victoria, Australia, known for its agricultural community and historic railway heritage.
  • E. Talmont
    Talmont is a historic coastal village in southwestern France, known for its medieval architecture and scenic position overlooking the Gironde estuary.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab2db38c8190b1f0ed6663ef8ada completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d90365da288190a132703df563de23 completed April 10, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f471c931a88190a9d29262c62b9472 completed May 1, 2026, 9:26 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:45 p.m.