Triple
T11929707
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Quapaw language |
E283876
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRecordedTexts |
P102207
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Quapaw language, hasRecordedTexts, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRecordedTexts Context triple: [Quapaw language, hasRecordedTexts, yes]
-
A.
hasRecordingWith
Indicates that one entity is associated with or includes a particular recording as part of its content or representation.
-
B.
recordingOf
Indicates that one entity is an audio or video capture or performance that documents, represents, or preserves another entity (such as a work, event, or expression).
-
C.
transcriptAvailable
Indicates that a transcript of the referenced content is available for access or use.
-
D.
hasRecordingLabel
Indicates that an entity (such as an artist or release) is associated with a particular recording label that publishes or distributes its music.
-
E.
hasRecordingContract
Indicates that an entity is formally bound by an agreement to produce recordings for another entity, typically a record label or similar organization.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab2ce9c48190b5d39511b524f666 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d90303a9a88190a4044e6310ba9b4b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d8bb3af0188190bfb22be5c97b3349 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:56 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d8d399d58c81908dab572aa82426d7 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:45 p.m.