Triple

T11928309
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Central Division (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts) E283842 entity
Predicate appliesEvidenceRules P6249 FINISHED
Object Federal Rules of Evidence E13641 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Federal Rules of Evidence | Statement: [Central Division (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts), appliesEvidenceRules, Federal Rules of Evidence]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Federal Rules of Evidence
Context triple: [Central Division (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts), appliesEvidenceRules, Federal Rules of Evidence]
  • A. rules of evidence for the federal courts chosen
    The rules of evidence for the federal courts are a comprehensive set of legal standards that govern what information may be presented and considered in United States federal court proceedings.
  • B. Washington Rules of Evidence
    The Washington Rules of Evidence are a codified set of legal standards governing the admissibility and use of evidence in Washington State courts.
  • C. Federal Rule of Evidence 1006
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows parties to present the contents of voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs in the form of summaries, charts, or calculations when the originals would be too cumbersome to examine in court.
  • D. Federal Rule of Evidence 1007
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1007 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows a party to prove the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph through the testimony or written statement of the opposing party without producing the original.
  • E. Federal Rule of Evidence 807
    Federal Rule of Evidence 807 is the “residual” hearsay exception that allows admission of certain trustworthy hearsay statements not covered by other specific exceptions when doing so serves the interests of justice.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab2ce9c48190b5d39511b524f666 completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d903024afc8190a97aa3263dc7d017 completed April 10, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f440611e648190b2c47b43f02d2e4b completed May 1, 2026, 5:55 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:45 p.m.