Triple
T11889775
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Miami Nation of Indiana |
E282882
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalCategoryUS |
P76736
|
FINISHED |
| Object | non-federally-recognized Indian group |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: non-federally-recognized Indian group | Statement: [Miami Nation of Indiana, legalCategoryUS, non-federally-recognized Indian group]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalCategoryUS Context triple: [Miami Nation of Indiana, legalCategoryUS, non-federally-recognized Indian group]
-
A.
juridicalCategory
chosen
Indicates the legal classification or status under which an entity or relationship is formally recognized in a juridical system.
-
B.
legalCodeFocus
Indicates that something is specifically concerned with, centered on, or primarily addressing a particular legal code or body of law.
-
C.
typeOfLaw
Indicates that one entity is a specific category or kind of law to which the other entity pertains.
-
D.
legalMatters
Indicates that one entity is involved with, concerned about, or responsible for legal issues, processes, or obligations related to another entity or context.
-
E.
legalConcept
Indicates a relationship where something is classified or treated as a concept defined and governed by law or legal theory.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab2a90b08190a4e818821cc93e6d |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8d3a2860c8190a21af5fcddbd2f1e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d8bb2fca4481909893f3428b0871ac |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:56 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:44 p.m.